<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Idea For Monetizing YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginemarketing.co.uk/blog/my-posts/rants/monetizing-youtub/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginemarketing.co.uk/blog/my-posts/rants/monetizing-youtub/</link>
	<description>Resources for the small and large business owners to learn about search engine marketing and find reputable SEO experts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 20:26:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginemarketing.co.uk/blog/my-posts/rants/monetizing-youtub/comment-page-1/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 11:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginemarketing.co.uk/?p=95#comment-581</guid>
		<description>Yea, it&#039;s tricky. I think inserting adverts isn&#039;t a good idea in the long term, as it lessens the enjoyment for users (we&#039;ve come to accept it on TV, but on a 3 minute video?). 

Maybe your sponsorship idea would be a good compromise, if they word it in such a way that it feels like the sponsor has enabled the video-maker to produce their work. So the sponsorship would be seen to be &quot;enabling&quot; the user&#039;s enjoyment of new videos, rather than getting in the way of their enjoyment

Cheers, Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, it&#8217;s tricky. I think inserting adverts isn&#8217;t a good idea in the long term, as it lessens the enjoyment for users (we&#8217;ve come to accept it on TV, but on a 3 minute video?). </p>
<p>Maybe your sponsorship idea would be a good compromise, if they word it in such a way that it feels like the sponsor has enabled the video-maker to produce their work. So the sponsorship would be seen to be &#8220;enabling&#8221; the user&#8217;s enjoyment of new videos, rather than getting in the way of their enjoyment</p>
<p>Cheers, Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben W.</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginemarketing.co.uk/blog/my-posts/rants/monetizing-youtub/comment-page-1/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginemarketing.co.uk/?p=95#comment-580</guid>
		<description>Ya that would be nice, they have such a huge community they could do something like a $100 dollar a year membership too for people submitting a lot of videos and give them some free tools and software and a virtual status. People love that when they are part of a community, I just wonder if if they could get enough to really make a big income difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya that would be nice, they have such a huge community they could do something like a $100 dollar a year membership too for people submitting a lot of videos and give them some free tools and software and a virtual status. People love that when they are part of a community, I just wonder if if they could get enough to really make a big income difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginemarketing.co.uk/blog/my-posts/rants/monetizing-youtub/comment-page-1/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginemarketing.co.uk/?p=95#comment-579</guid>
		<description>Nice idea Ben

Coming at it from a different direction, YouTube could create premium membership options for people who view lots of videos - maybe no adverts if you pay $5 per month. Or a faster server for premium members

Cheers, Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice idea Ben</p>
<p>Coming at it from a different direction, YouTube could create premium membership options for people who view lots of videos &#8211; maybe no adverts if you pay $5 per month. Or a faster server for premium members</p>
<p>Cheers, Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
