<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Idea For Monetizing YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginemarketing.co.uk/blog/my-posts/rants/monetizing-youtub/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginemarketing.co.uk/blog/my-posts/rants/monetizing-youtub/</link>
	<description>Resources for the small and large business owners to learn about search engine marketing and find reputable SEO experts.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginemarketing.co.uk/blog/my-posts/rants/monetizing-youtub/comment-page-1/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 11:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginemarketing.co.uk/?p=95#comment-581</guid>
		<description>Yea, it's tricky. I think inserting adverts isn't a good idea in the long term, as it lessens the enjoyment for users (we've come to accept it on TV, but on a 3 minute video?). 

Maybe your sponsorship idea would be a good compromise, if they word it in such a way that it feels like the sponsor has enabled the video-maker to produce their work. So the sponsorship would be seen to be "enabling" the user's enjoyment of new videos, rather than getting in the way of their enjoyment

Cheers, Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, it&#8217;s tricky. I think inserting adverts isn&#8217;t a good idea in the long term, as it lessens the enjoyment for users (we&#8217;ve come to accept it on TV, but on a 3 minute video?). </p>
<p>Maybe your sponsorship idea would be a good compromise, if they word it in such a way that it feels like the sponsor has enabled the video-maker to produce their work. So the sponsorship would be seen to be &#8220;enabling&#8221; the user&#8217;s enjoyment of new videos, rather than getting in the way of their enjoyment</p>
<p>Cheers, Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben W.</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginemarketing.co.uk/blog/my-posts/rants/monetizing-youtub/comment-page-1/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginemarketing.co.uk/?p=95#comment-580</guid>
		<description>Ya that would be nice, they have such a huge community they could do something like a $100 dollar a year membership too for people submitting a lot of videos and give them some free tools and software and a virtual status. People love that when they are part of a community, I just wonder if if they could get enough to really make a big income difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya that would be nice, they have such a huge community they could do something like a $100 dollar a year membership too for people submitting a lot of videos and give them some free tools and software and a virtual status. People love that when they are part of a community, I just wonder if if they could get enough to really make a big income difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginemarketing.co.uk/blog/my-posts/rants/monetizing-youtub/comment-page-1/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginemarketing.co.uk/?p=95#comment-579</guid>
		<description>Nice idea Ben

Coming at it from a different direction, YouTube could create premium membership options for people who view lots of videos - maybe no adverts if you pay $5 per month. Or a faster server for premium members

Cheers, Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice idea Ben</p>
<p>Coming at it from a different direction, YouTube could create premium membership options for people who view lots of videos - maybe no adverts if you pay $5 per month. Or a faster server for premium members</p>
<p>Cheers, Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
